Why doesn't Samsung have a smaller ultra phone

[MattSquires1570]

Now yall know how apple has the pro and pro max well the pro is the pro max but smaller i feel like samsung should di that and call it the sansung galaxy S Ultra for the smaller one and call the bigger One the Samsung Galaxy S Ultra+ bc the smaller one would be useful to people that have smaller hands that want the ultra modle just not so big

[meself]

Think the plus or the smaller 25 for example would fill that

[MattSquires1570]

But people also want the ultra without it being so big like they might want the 100x zoom or the spen a better screen

[meself]

I get what you're saying but don't see that being option

[meself]

Sure

[MattSquires1570]

I get that you don’t see it as an option, but hear me out—Samsung’s Ultra line is amazing, no doubt. That’s why people want it without the bulk. Not everyone wants to carry a phone that feels like a brick just to get the best camera, S Pen, and screen. Apple figured this out with the Pro and Pro Max. Why can’t Samsung do the same? A smaller Ultra wouldn’t replace the big one—it would expand the lineup for people who care about features but also comfort. I’m a Samsung fan, and I just want more people to enjoy the Ultra experience without needing basketball hands.”

[Mujibar]

Great question! Google and Apple can do it. Why can't Samsung make a smaller Ultra? It's not like there isn't a market for it.

[TipsyTrex]

Camera module + S-Pen take up too much space for a small body phone to offer ultra tier battery and performance, also small phones historically sell significantly worse than large phones if not outright failing on the market.

[MattSquires1570]

Well the spen is pretty small and the camera the camera they would be the same i mean samsung if they did they would make a design so I would fit if apple has there same camera in the pro and pro max and we have the same camera in the s25 and s25plus what the difference